Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0613620110310040285
Health Social Welfare Review
2011 Volume.31 No. 4 p.285 ~ p.314
An Expert Evaluation Study of Basic Income Protection Schemes in Korea and Japan
Lee Myoung-Hyun

Park Kyung-Il
Kang Dae-Seon
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the feasibility of a basic income for Korea and Japan. To achieve this, the authors surveyed on the perception of 6 Korean researchers and 4 Japanese researchers by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). We identified the difference of respondents¡¯ perceived weight among the each elements and alternatives in the research model. The Korean researchers were found to view national political regime as the most important base for a basic income protection system. In particular, they supported collectivist-redistributionist policy. They also preferred a higher tax on interest, dividend, stocks etc, and thought that redistributive benefits should be provided in an amount equal to the minimum cost of living for all Korean residents. The Japanese researchers thought the determination of eligibility and the benefit level to be the most important element. The common factors running through both countries include residence-based universal entitlement and benefits equivalent to the national minimum cost of living. Based on these and other findings, the authors in this study discussed suggestions and policy implications for the development of basic income protection.
KEYWORD
AHP, Basic Income, Unconditionality, Sufficiency
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)